By Detlev Fetchenhauer, Andreas Flache, Abraham Buunk, Sigwaart Lindenberg
The subject of prosocial habit (e.g. equity, harmony, and altruism) has lately shifted again into the guts of realization in numerous disciplines, starting from economics throughout sociology and psychology in the direction of biology. it really is now a well-accepted truth in all human sciences that human habit isn't really continually ruled through egotism and egocentric causes. regrettably, this doesn't clarify why human additionally act blatantly egocentric and are ignorant of the pain of others. This e-book is a reaction to the main issue. It brings jointly major researchers in sociology and psychology to provide an explanation for human egotism and altruism utilizing not just their sector of analysis but additionally bringing in study from economics and biology. for the reason that this paintings brings jointly the study of many alternative disciplines, an entire account of unity and prosocial habit is gifted.
Read Online or Download Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior: An Integration of Sociological and Psychological Perspectives (Critical Issues in Social Justice) PDF
Similar personality books
The effect of the lifespan procedure has been an immense function of contemporary study in developmental psychology, as has a growing to be curiosity within the courting among character and improvement. Edited via distinct psychologists and together with the paintings of the various top figures within the box, this crucial new booklet explores the connection among character and improvement.
The mental examine of ethical improvement has multiplied enormously, either when it comes to the range of theoretical views which are represented within the box, in addition to within the diversity of subject matters which have been studied. This instruction manual of ethical improvement represents the range and multidisciplinary impacts on present theorizing in regards to the mental learn of ethical improvement and the variety and extensive scope of issues being thought of by way of students within the box.
The switch in paradigm in our box is clear of the nice human being conception of management and the trainer in his or her personal school room to the advance of studying groups which worth changes and help severe mirrored image and inspire participants to question, problem, and debate instructing and studying concerns.
- Type Talk: The 16 Personality Types That Determine How We Live, Love, and Work
- Chinese Modernity and the Individual Psyche
- The Invisible Man: A Self-help Guide for Men With Eating Disorders, Compulsive Exercise and Bigorexia
- Assessing Hispanic Clients Using the Mmpi-2 and Mmpi-a
Additional resources for Solidarity and Prosocial Behavior: An Integration of Sociological and Psychological Perspectives (Critical Issues in Social Justice)
W. ), Social psychology. Handbook of basic principles (pp. 493–520). London: Guilford. M. (1995). Solidarity in economic transactions: An experimental study of framing effects in bargaining and contracting. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis. M. (1988). Contractual relations and weak solidarity: The behavioral basis of restraints on gain-maximization. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 144, 39–58. M. (1992). An extended theory of institutions and contractual discipline. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 148, 125–154.
Ten years of research on group size and helping. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 308–324. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York: McGraw Hill. M. (1998). Solidarity: Its microfoundations and macro-dependence. A framing approach. In P. J. ), The problem of solidarity: Theories and models (pp. 61–112). Amsterdam: Gordon and Breach. J. (1990). The rise and fall of self-interest in the explanation of political life. J. ), Beyond self-interest (pp. 3–22). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Such a frame is directly tied to the self, but it is removed from direct emotional involvement in the sense 2: Prosocial Behavior, Solidarity, and Framing Processes 35 that resources must be used before they have any hedonic effect. By contrast, the experience of loss of resources (and the goal of loss avoidance) is likely to be directly tied to emotions and thus will more likely trigger a hedonic frame, instantly shorting the time horizon. A third general goal (only seemingly unrelated to improvement) is the wish “to act appropriately,” which belongs to a frame that may be called a normative frame.