By Daniel Innerarity, Javier Solana, Sandra Kingery, Stephen Williams
Humanity at Risk compares various ways to the subject matter of worldwide threats utilizing the instruments of philosophy, serious concept, and political suggestion along simpler, socio-political observations. by means of defining the belief of "global danger" extra particularly, Editors Innerarity and Solana, and their members, think we will know the way those hazards will be evaluated, envisioned, and controlled in the framework of democratic societies.The target of this e-book is to focus on extra exactly the necessity, within the face of recent international hazards, for brand spanking new governance at a countrywide, ecu, and international level.
Read Online or Download Humanity at Risk: The Need for Global Governance PDF
Similar international relations books
During this provocative and incisive e-book, Zaki Laidi argues that as our global turns into ever greater, our skill to discover that means in it diminishes. With the top of communism got here the top of the intimate alliance among energy and beliefs. No strength in our globalised international can any more declare to supply that means.
Utilizing a comparative framework, this new quantity specializes in how non-standard employment may be regulated in very assorted social, political and institutional settings. After surveying those new sorts of paintings and the hot calls for for labour-market rules, the authors determine attainable suggestions between local-level actors and supply an in depth research of ways organizations check the benefits and drawbacks of versatile kinds of employment.
This booklet examines the factors and effects of the hindrance in Atlantic family members that followed the invasion of Iraq in March 2003. A dstinguished workforce of political scientists and historians from Europe and the USA tackles those matters. The authors' collective concentration isn't at the conflict itself, or the way it used to be performed, or maybe the placement in Iraq both ahead of or after the clash.
How have nuclear guns affected the way in which international locations take care of each other? The Nuclear Revolution solutions this query via evaluating the nuclear age with past sessions of foreign heritage, from the 5th century B. C. to the 20th century. The Nuclear Revolution bargains insightful and provocative views at the Soviet-American nuclear palms race, evaluating it with the Anglo-German naval contention sooner than global warfare I and with glossy tariff competitions.
- Routledge Handbook of Regionalism & Federalism
- Soviet Policy towards Syria since 1970
- Civilian Protection in Armed Conflicts: Evolution, Challenges and Implementation
- A Survey of European Nuclear Policy, 1985–87
- Morphogenesis and the Crisis of Normativity
Additional info for Humanity at Risk: The Need for Global Governance
The condition is that globalization must be decoded not as economic fate, but as a strategic game for world power. A new global domestic politics that is already at work here and now, beyond the national–international distinction, has become a meta-power game, whose outcome is completely open-ended. It is a game in which boundaries, basic rules, and basic distinctions are renegotiated—not only between national and international spheres, but also between global business and the state, transnational civil society movements, supra-national organizations, and national governments and societies.
The author is thankful to the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) for financing his research within the framework of its Special Project on Reflexive Modernization. 20 Humanity at Risk and threats of an unprecedented magnitude” (Beck 1992, 19). Scientific-technical “progress” threatens the very existence of modern societies and, more generally, the process of social modernization turns against its own foundations. In recent years, Beck especially has developed the theory of a “late” or “second” modernity into a global sociological theory of the “global risk society” (Beck 1999, 2005, 2009).
Forsthoff himself located this change within the context of increasing state functions, and more precisely, within the expansion of the twentieth-century welfare state. With the responsibility of precaution toward new types of risks to civilization, this problem has intensified even further: “Each technologically complex project that interacts with the social environment is Global Risks and Preventive Governance 27 a ‘prototype’ for which there is no sequence, for which there are no past experiences and for which the legal duty of determining the boundary between the protected area of the fundamental right to life and the respect for physical integrity and the residual risk accepted by all citizens must be redrawn every time” (Preuss 1994, 542).